One year on, those who underwent the ancient practice, involving fine needles, had achieved pregnancy rates of 46.2 per cent. Among those who had not, pregnancy rates were just 21.7 per cent.
Dr Adam Balen, chairman of the British Fertility Society described the findings as “very interesting”.
He said: “There is no doubt that when people are given acupuncture it can feel like an extra dimension of support. Fertility treatment is stressful and it can be quite helpful to have a therapy which relaxes them.”
He said there was no evidence that the controversial practice – dismissed by critics as “mumbo jumbo” – does any harm to those trying to start a family.
But he said some of the herbs associated with traditional Chinese medicine could be dangerous, and cautioned against their use.
Stuart Lavery, consultant gynaecologist at Hammersmith Hospital, said many women suffering fertility treatment were interested in alternative therapies.
“There is a patient demand and a patient interest in the field of acupuncture and probably in the area of traditional Chinese medicine overall, but the area is sadly lacking in rigorous prospective randomised assessment,” he said.
“This study is interesting in that it does seem to show a statistically significant difference.”
He said it was not clear whether acupuncture had a physiological effect on the body, or whether who underwent the sessions became more relaxed because therapists spent time listening to their problems.
“The weakness of this study is that you can’t control for the placebo effect,” he said.
“Patients are often looking for someone who can give them time and listen to what’s going on in their lives,” he said. “And that may have some therapeutic benefit.”